star star star_half star_border star_border
4 User Reviews
LAST UPDATED: February 5th, 2021 was launched in 2010 and is a platform designed to bring together freelancers and potential employers in a more casual environment with a social networking format. Freelancers can use this site for free, or can pay up to $7 a month for basic, professional, or premium benefits. Paid membership benefits include: exposure to more job opportunities, higher inclusion on databases searched by employers, and inclusion on the homepage. For employers the service is completely free to post jobs. Furthermore, employers can browse user directories (in which the order of freelancer appearance is based on their type of membership) or wait for freelancers to apply directly. The concept is very simple compared to some other freelancing platforms. Freelancers enter their information, create a username and password, and create a customized profile outlining their skills. Users can include portfolios-essentially samples of their work-on their page that can be viewed by other users and potential employers. Similar to Facebook and other social networking platforms, users can add friends, like portfolios (called giving kudos), set up a profile picture, and even give status updates on their wall. Furthermore, they can join groups of other users with similar skills and interests. Thus in addition to making themselves available for potential job opportunities, users can also network and collaborate with other freelancers. Once a match is made between freelancer and employer, the role of the site is completely eliminated. They don't facilitate payments, and they don't require a percentage of the freelancer's earnings as do some freelancing platforms. In terms of receiving payment, the only thing they do is recommend services like PayPal and escrow.

Top Ranked Companies

LinkedIn Logo
#1 LinkedIn chevron_right
5.2 Overall Score
star star star star star_border
Toptal Logo
#2 Toptal chevron_right
4.6 Overall Score
star star star star_half star_border
CraigsList Logo
#3 CraigsList chevron_right
4.4 Overall Score
star star star star_half star_border

The Good

  • Appeal to younger users
  • Low membership fee
It's clear that this site wants to appeal to the social media generation. Younger users will find it a breath of fresh air compared to other alternatives that some would consider stuffy and uninviting. Furthermore, users will be happy with the simplicity of the site. It's very easy to find answers to your basic questions-like membership fees and the application process-that some other sites seemingly go to great lengths to hide. The social networking format also provides opportunities for communication between freelancers, which is overall an uncommon feature for freelancing platforms. This could provide additional opportunities for freelancers to collaborate on certain tasks, or for friends of different skill sets to communicate about other potential job opportunities not found on the website. Another benefit of this site is the relatively low membership fee. In fact, many users may opt to try the service for free before expanding their opportunities through a paid membership. Even the most expensive membership ($7/month) is pretty cheap compared to other pay sites. Furthermore, there are no additional charges for each job application. Additionally, the site will not take a percentage of your pay like some freelancing platforms.

The Bad

  • Amount of applicants
  • Casual nature
  • Lack of payment services
  • Few guarantees

Because the majority of the services of this site can be used for free, it has the potential to be overrun with good and bad applicants alike. This will increase the amount of applications submitted for each job. This could quickly become overwhelming to employers, who don't want to comb through hundreds or thousands of applications to find the needles within the haystack. Furthermore, this could be frustrating for highly qualified users, who may never be found because they'll be buried within a deep pool of applicants. Because employers don't pay any kind of fee to post a job, the site could also be flooded with worthless job postings. While the site does reserve the right to remove any postings or other information that they deem inappropriate, it is unclear if, how, and how often this type of regulation takes place. Because of some of the issues described above, it's possible that high quality employers and big name companies may look elsewhere for freelancers. The site seems a bit too casual for a very serious, very professional business to first look for freelancers. This may also turn away some freelancers. While casual freelancers will likely flock to this site, it may deter more serious users who fear they are simply joining a mash-up between Facebook and LinkedIn that's full of unprofessional job seekers. Some users may dislike the lack of payment services by the site. While it's certainly a benefit that they don't charge a service fee or take a percentage of your pay, there's an inherent inconvenience that the site is not a one-stop destination for both finding employment and processing payments. A final con is the lack of guarantees. While buying a membership guarantees you certain privileges (such as being higher on lists viewed by potential employers) there is no guarantee that your application will be viewed or that you will receive a job-both of which are guarantees offered by some other freelancing platforms. That being said, the membership fees aren't nearly as high as the sites that do have guarantees.


The Bottom Line will certainly appeal to more casual users due to its social networking format, intuitive website, and free services. Furthermore, it provides additional benefits to more serious users attempting to beef up their chances of obtaining employment by offering paid memberships. The more casual format may influence the types of employers who post there. Overall, there's no harm in trying out a free membership and networking with other users, but very serious, more professional freelancers may want to look elsewhere.

Was this content helpful?
thumb_up Yes thumb_down No

Star Rating


star star star_half star_border star_border

4 Reviews

Review Breakdown

5 grade


4 grade


3 grade


2 grade


1 grade


Sentiment Criteria


star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border


star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border


star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border


star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border

Filter by:


Sort by:

star star star star star_border

Brook Powell Ishpeming, MI is one of the better sites I have found for the simple reason of price and traffic in the form of people looking at my work. In six months, I have received over 50,000 hits, while in comparison with FAA I received 3000 hits in six years. Saatchi Art was even more dismal so I feel, if you have good work on this site, and their is good work on it, you will gain incredible exposure. I have been able to display 154 paintings on my page which is a lot more than other expensive sites where you usually get buried by amauters doing grandmother art or artists who are already famous who hog all the attention. Sales do not concern me because I just want a good presence on the web where I can show my work to people. Unless you are doing copies of photographs, the mall sites won't help you at all because I know from experience, people will not look at your stuff if it is different. gives me hope.

4 years ago

star star_border star_border star_border star_border

John Strebyma Flint, MI

This company is a total waste of time. It is obvious that there is no vetting or screening of the job postings. As a result, we see inexperienced writers hoping to get lucky, who expect to get an entire family biography or autobiography written for $300, or think they should only pay $100 to have their featherweight manuscript edited from scratch and completed. The company must assume that its customers at the delivery end are so desperate for editing credits that they will work for waitress wages---but without even the tips! In that regard, shows that it has no respect for the trade that it purports to be serving. I have unsubscribed from this worthless service, and urge others to do the same, unless they want to stay on for the humor of what watching wannabe writers, who apparently think that the literary establishment owes them a shot at the brass ring, prove their profound naivete. I am not sure why the company thinks that these cheapskate wannabes can serve as an effective loss leader for legitimate aspiring writers who recognize the value of good editing, consulting, and related services. But I don't intend to pay even a modest amount of money to find out. If wants to attract bona-fide writers for submissions, and skilled editors/consultants to provide needed assistance, the first step would be to put out the word that the company is not the "Salvation Army" for writers. In all fields, there is a direct correlation between what you pay for and what you get.

2 years ago

star star star star star_border

Nathaniel Haggard ,

This platform worked better for me if speaking about job/tax ratio. Despite the lack of userfiendliness, it is decent for light freelance.

11 months ago

star star_border star_border star_border star_border

Bob Berry Red Hook, NY has netted me some jobs, but a majority of the jobs I appy for are either grossly underfunded or posted by no professional creative users who have no idea what kind of value ( and thus expense) hiring a creative can incur... it's pretty much a waste of money.

5 years ago