BestCompany.com is trying to work directly with this company to verify the accuracy of the information on this page. Thank you for your patience as we make sure we’re getting it right.
Are you a representative
of this company?Claim this Profile
Freelanced.com was launched in 2010 and is a platform designed to bring together freelancers and potential employers in a more casual environment with a social networking format. Freelancers can use this site for free, or can pay up to $7 a month for basic, professional, or premium benefits. Paid membership benefits include: exposure to more job opportunities, higher inclusion on databases searched by employers, and inclusion on the homepage. For employers the service is completely free to post jobs. Furthermore, employers can browse user directories (in which the order of freelancer appearance is based on their type of membership) or wait for freelancers to apply directly.
The concept is very simple compared to some other freelancing platforms. Freelancers enter their information, create a username and password, and create a customized profile outlining their skills. Users can include portfolios-essentially samples of their work-on their page that can be viewed by other users and potential employers. Similar to Facebook and other social networking platforms, users can add friends, like portfolios (called giving kudos), set up a profile picture, and even give status updates on their wall. Furthermore, they can join groups of other users with similar skills and interests. Thus in addition to making themselves available for potential job opportunities, users can also network and collaborate with other freelancers.
Once a match is made between freelancer and employer, the role of the site is completely eliminated. They don't facilitate payments, and they don't require a percentage of the freelancer's earnings as do some freelancing platforms. In terms of receiving payment, the only thing they do is recommend services like PayPal and escrow.
|Upwork (formerly oDesk) ›|
It's clear that this site wants to appeal to the social media generation. Younger users will find it a breath of fresh air compared to other alternatives that some would consider stuffy and uninviting. Furthermore, users will be happy with the simplicity of the site. It's very easy to find answers to your basic questions-like membership fees and the application process-that some other sites seemingly go to great lengths to hide. The social networking format also provides opportunities for communication between freelancers, which is overall an uncommon feature for freelancing platforms. This could provide additional opportunities for freelancers to collaborate on certain tasks, or for friends of different skill sets to communicate about other potential job opportunities not found on the website.
Another benefit of this site is the relatively low membership fee. In fact, many users may opt to try the service for free before expanding their opportunities through a paid membership. Even the most expensive membership ($7/month) is pretty cheap compared to other pay sites. Furthermore, there are no additional charges for each job application. Additionally, the site will not take a percentage of your pay like some freelancing platforms.
Because the majority of the services of this site can be used for free, it has the potential to be overrun with good and bad applicants alike. This will increase the amount of applications submitted for each job. This could quickly become overwhelming to employers, who don't want to comb through hundreds or thousands of applications to find the needles within the haystack. Furthermore, this could be frustrating for highly qualified users, who may never be found because they'll be buried within a deep pool of applicants. Because employers don't pay any kind of fee to post a job, the site could also be flooded with worthless job postings. While the site does reserve the right to remove any postings or other information that they deem inappropriate, it is unclear if, how, and how often this type of regulation takes place.
Because of some of the issues described above, it's possible that high quality employers and big name companies may look elsewhere for freelancers. The site seems a bit too casual for a very serious, very professional business to first look for freelancers. This may also turn away some freelancers. While casual freelancers will likely flock to this site, it may deter more serious users who fear they are simply joining a mash-up between Facebook and LinkedIn that's full of unprofessional job seekers.
Some users may dislike the lack of payment services by the site. While it's certainly a benefit that they don't charge a service fee or take a percentage of your pay, there's an inherent inconvenience that the site is not a one-stop destination for both finding employment and processing payments.
A final con is the lack of guarantees. While buying a membership guarantees you certain privileges (such as being higher on lists viewed by potential employers) there is no guarantee that your application will be viewed or that you will receive a job-both of which are guarantees offered by some other freelancing platforms. That being said, the membership fees aren't nearly as high as the sites that do have guarantees.
As part of our service, we attempt to partner with all the companies that we review, and may get compensated when you click or call them from our site; however, regardless of any current, past, or future financial arrangements, companies listed on Best Company cannot buy their position, nor do we manipulate or inflate a company's ranking for financial gain. A company’s ranking is based on and calculated by an objective set of ranking criteria, as well as user reviews. For more information on how we rank companies, click here.
All user reviews posted on Best Company are subject to screening and approval. We reserve the right to approve or deny any review posted to this site in accordance with our Review Guidelines. Best Company never suppresses user reviews—unless they are being investigated for authenticity, or if they violate our review guidelines. We encourage anyone who suspects a user review to be fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate to please notify us here.
Freelanced.com is one of the better sites I have found for the simple reason of price and traffic in the form of people looking at my work. In six months, I have received over 50,000 hits, while in comparison with FAA I received 3000 hits in six years. Saatchi Art was even more dismal so I feel, if you have good work on this site, and their is good work on it, you will gain incredible exposure. I have been able to display 154 paintings on my page which is a lot more than other expensive sites where you usually get buried by amauters doing grandmother art or artists who are already famous who hog all the attention. Sales do not concern me because I just want a good presence on the web where I can show my work to people. Unless you are doing copies of photographs, the mall sites won't help you at all because I know from experience, people will not look at your stuff if it is different. Freelanced.com gives me hope.
Freelanced.com has netted me some jobs, but a majority of the jobs I appy for are either grossly underfunded or posted by no professional creative users who have no idea what kind of value ( and thus expense) hiring a creative can incur... it's pretty much a waste of money.